The Unvarnished Truth: US Embraces High Seas Executions
The United States, under the Trump administration, initiated a disturbing pattern of lethal force on international waters, resulting in the deaths of at least 27 individuals in what human rights experts unequivocally label as extrajudicial killings. This brutal policy, cloaked in the rhetoric of counter-narcotics, involved US military strikes on vessels allegedly linked to drug trafficking, primarily off the coast of Venezuela [2], [5].
In one egregious incident, at least 14 people were killed during strikes on two boats accused of carrying drug traffickers [1]. Later, another six perished in a separate strike on a vessel that the US president vaguely associated with illicit narcoterrorist networks, notably without providing any corroborating evidence [7]. Cumulatively, these incidents highlight a systematic disregard for international law, culminating in the stated figure of 27 deaths.
A Dangerous Precedent in International Waters
Human Rights Watch was swift and unambiguous in its condemnation, stating that US military strikes using lethal force against suspected drug traffickers violate international human rights law [1]. The organization’s Washington director, Sarah Yager, put it plainly: “US officials cannot summarily kill people they accuse of smuggling drugs” [1].
Experts outside the administration echo this grave concern. Sanho Tree, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, has warned that the deployment of the US military in combating drug trafficking represents a perilous escalation, recalling past counter-narcotics missions that tragically claimed civilian lives [3]. The justification for such aggressive tactics often leans on a disingenuous “invasion theory,” which absurdly equates the domestic opioid crisis with a 9/11-level threat, thereby excusing the militarization of law enforcement across the Western Hemisphere [3]. This response, Tree asserted, is “exacerbating a trend of militarizing law enforcement” [3]. Another expert plainly stated the “only conclusion that can be drawn is that under all relevant laws, this was an extrajudicial killing” [3]. The entire situation is not just troubling, but “outrageous” [3].
The Official Spin Versus Reality
The administration’s claims of targeting “narcoterrorist networks” lacked substantiation [7], revealing a pattern of leveraging broad accusations to justify lethal action without due process. As one civil rights attorney noted, these actions suggest President Trump was “claiming the right to conduct extra-judicial assassinations” [4].
Such tactics are not just legally dubious but morally bankrupt. The US military, as HRW rightly demands, must “immediately halt any plans for future unlawful strikes and ensure that all military operations comply with international human rights and humanitarian law” [1]. The American people deserve to know why their government is conducting summary executions on the high seas, far from public scrutiny and accountability.
Sources & Footnotes
- https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/09/18/us-maritime-strikes-amount-to-extrajudicial-killings ↩
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TXNLfPB1Qg ↩
- https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article312082403.html ↩
- https://truthout.org/articles/experts-say-trump-admins-deadly-boat-attack-amounts-to-extrajudicial-killings/ ↩
- https://time.com/7317506/us-venezuela-war-powers-international-law-trump-maduro-drugs-cartel-boat-strike/ ↩
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_strikes_on_Venezuelan_boats ↩
- https://www.irishtimes.com/world/us/2025/10/14/trump-says-six-killed-in-us-strike-on-boat-allegedly-carrying-drugs-off-venezuelas-coast/ ↩
Leave a Reply